The NASA mystery bugs

Recently, a video has been going somewhat viral online about “strange bugs” that have, apparently, “baffled NASA scientists”.

I don’t know which of NASA’s scientists were looking at these insects – I am sure there are some NASA entomologists somewhere, but I have no idea if they were consulted! If we’re actually talking about physicists and engineers, I think they can be forgiven for focusing their expertise on looking after astronauts, etc.! Now, I’m not especially familiar with the insect fauna of the USA, but here are my two pennies (or two cents?) on the “mystery”:

1. The insects look to me like nymphs of Hemiptera, probably Pentatomidae (shieldbugs). For comparison, here‘s a picture of a nymphal Southern Green Shieldbug/Stinkbug, here‘s the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug nymphs (so cute!) and here is the nymph of the Heather Shieldbug. While perhaps not identical to the insects in the video, the general appearance is broadly similar.

So what are they up to? In the video they seem to walk around in formation, sometimes circling, other times lining up.

Let’s think about what shieldbugs do in their day-to-day life. Mostly, they potter around on plants, especially walking up and down stems, feeding on plant material (usually – there are also some predators in this group). When you’re walking along a twig, it’s useful to know where the twig is leading you, when it comes to an end, and whether you’re about to hit the main stem or a leaf or something. A good way of doing this can be to grow a pair of long, waggly antennae and wave them about in front of you.

Indeed, it’s fairly normal for insects to display thigmotaxis, which is basically described the insect modifying its behaviour in response to a touch stimulus. It’s not just insects that do that – if you’ve ever had an infestation of mice, you’ve probably noticed they tend to hang around skirting boards and rarely make a full on dash across a large kitchen. Partly, these sorts of behaviours are mediated by keeping a sensitive body part (in an insect’s case, often antennae or legs; in a mouse’s case, probably whiskers) touching a nice solid, reassuring wall or twig.

When you’re doing behavioural entomology, this can be a bit of  a pain in the proverbial. For a piece of kit like a four-arm olfactometer, it’s not entirely helpful when the insect whose odour preferences you’re trying to determine instead seems more interested in walking continuous loops around the outside of the olfactometer chamber. Other devices like locomotion compensators attempt to overcome these problems by removing all the edges from the setup.

In any case, how might this manifest in thigmotactic insects suddenly thrown into a place where there are no nearby edges, only some conspecifics? This leads to…

2. In an attempt to find an edge, perhaps our Mystery Texan Bugs (for bugs, indeed, they seem to be) are antennating the area around themselves and when they find a solid object – the tip of a friend’s abdomen – they follow it. It could be that there are also odour cues that make the abdomen tip especially attractive (if you’re walking along a twig, single-file is probably the way to go). This would result in behaviours like following each other in circles and attempted entomological conga lines (a behaviour that may also be occasionally observed after conference dinners at Ento conferences…).

So in conclusion, their behaviour and appearance is fascinating and lovely, but my personal opinion is that it’s not that surprising. We might have to look a bit harder for alien life… Especially when such marvels don’t require going much further than a suburban back garden.

Update: Apparently the Mystery Bugs have been identified as Homaemus proteus – which is indeed a species of shieldbug. Here are some more photos of the first instar nymphs, and here is the adult. What’s probably most remarkable is that it’s in the group Scutelleridae, which is the metallic shield bugs – H. proteus is actually pretty dull compared to some closely related species.


Bad TV entomology

Anyone watching a TV drama featuring their particular area of interest/professional specialism will probably find holes in it. Whether it’s a doctor watching a TV medical drama, a police officer watching a cop show, or a classicist watching a costume drama set in Ancient Rome, I’m sure they end up finding something to criticise. Of course, a lot of these mistakes can be prevented with a simple phone call to the right specialist!

As a lover of insects, it’s bad TV entomology that really bothers me! Some productions (e.g. the stunning movie Duke of Burgundy) get it pretty much correct, but others…not so much. It tends to come up perhaps once a year or so, but where possible I do like to keep a record of the culprits and screencap the offending items.

They amuse and frustrate me in equal measure, not least because there are loads of people across the country/world who would gladly have set the producers/prop specialists on the right path if asked.

A typical example was from the TV show The Body Farm, in which one character (allegedly with an interest in forensic entomology) claimed to find dermestid skin beetles on a corpse, but the beetle he then held up looked to me like Tenebrio molitor, the mealworm beetle – presumably because they can be easily obtained from the live food section of a local pet shop and saved someone some time obtaining!

Another one: Death in Paradise, where telling the difference between a click beetle (Elateridae) and a jewel beetle (Buprestidae) was apparently beyond whoever was in charge of props…

DIP notaclick

Not a click beetle, but a nice jewel beetle. Which are used as jewellery in some cultures!

Ripper Street is another example – they reference an “Old World Swallowtail” in one episode, presumably referring to our native species Papilio machaon (which does, as they say, feed on milk parsley), but the butterflies and picture they proceeded to show actually appear to be the Scarce Southern Swallowtail, Iphiclides feisthamelii, which is native to the Mediterranean but not the UK, and eats small rose-family trees like apple, pear and almond.


It is a swallowtail, but you won’t find it in the UK, and it doesn’t eat milk parsley.

Most recently was an episode of Whitechapel (apparently the East End is a focus for bad TV entomology?) about a poisoning with Spanish Fly. This is obtained from the Meloidae beetle Lytta vesicatoria, a fairly elongate metallic green beetle. For reasons I don’t understand, the “Spanish Flies” pictured in this episode were actually some sort of fruit chafer – not even the same family. Same colour, different in almost every other respect. In fact, in one scene with the live beetles it seemed there were two species in the cage, and neither looked right!




This also is not Lytta vesicatoria.


And neither is anything in this image.

Does it matter? Good question. I guess most people wouldn’t remember exactly what an insect looked like on a TV show. But if it can be argued that wearing a Casio watch in a costume drama is jarring for some viewers, or using anachronistic language bothers others, I think it’s reasonable to ask for a decent attempt at factual accuracy on the entomology.

So if you’re listening, TV producers – if you’re putting insects into an episode of your show, please feel free to e-mail me a couple of photos and ask whether the insect in the picture is really the one on which your plot pivots (or at least morphologically not distinguishable from the correct one)! It would save entomologists a lot of teeth-grinding!

(Postscript: I realise this article has also laid bare my utter weakness for a good – or even mediocre – crime drama, given that all the examples seem to have a certain similarity of genre.)